Police, prosecutors talk about getting conviction against Scott Peterson
Updated March 17, 2005, 6:01 p.m. ET
By Harriet Ryan
Court TV
MODESTO, Calif. — The prosecutors who won a capital
murder conviction against Scott Peterson were bound by a
gag order during the six-month trial, but at a news
conference Thursday, they finally said the two words
they wanted to tell all the legal analysts on television
second-guessing their court performance.
"Trust us," Stanislaus County Senior Deputy District
Attorney Dave Harris told a room full of reporters the
day after Peterson was formally sentenced to death for
the murders of his wife and unborn son.
"We would have liked the talking heads to say, 'Well,
maybe these guys do know what they are doing,'" Harris
said of the commentators who spent the early months of
the trial ridiculing the Modesto prosecutors as
incompetent and out of their depth.
"My mom would call and say, 'They are just saying
terrible things about you,'" Deputy District Attorney
Rick Distaso said.
Ultimately, the
prosecutors from the small, agricultural county bested
Peterson and his high-profile Los Angeles attorney, Mark
Geragos, convincing 12 jurors he had plotted and carried
out the murders of his wife, Laci, and son.
The news conference at police headquarters was the first
opportunity for police and prosecutors who built the
circumstantial case against the 32-year-old to discuss
at length the work they began on Dec. 24, 2002 — the day
Peterson reported the expectant mother missing.
Laci Peterson's mother and stepfather, Sharon Rocha and
Ron Grantski, were scheduled to attend the briefing, but
a spokeswoman for the couple said they were drained from
the emotional statements they made during the sentencing
hearing.
"They are exhausted today, both emotionally and
physically," the spokeswoman, Kim Peterson, said.
The press conference had a markedly different tone from
Wednesday's wrenching sentencing hearing in Redwood
City, the site of the trial.
Back in their hometown, just hours after Peterson was
moved to death row at San Quentin State Prison,
prosecutors and police officers appeared relaxed and
relieved.
Modesto Police Department detective Al Brocchini, who
wept Wednesday as Sharon Rocha described missing her
daughter and grandson, broke into a broad smile during
the press conference.
He and another detective, Jon Buehler, said that it was
an inside joke in the department that he and three other
detectives at the center of the investigation only had
high-school diplomas, but the man they were pursuing
held a degree from California Polytechnic University.
"He liked to think he was smarter than everybody,"
Brocchini said. "I want him to know I have a high-school
diploma only."
The prosecution team also praised Peterson's mistress,
Amber Frey, for her performance on the witness stand.
"Geragos wasn't able to lay a mark on her," Buehler
said.
Harris added, "She was a very crucial witness, not just
for her testimony, but for what came with her, which
were the audio tapes."
Those tapes showed Peterson pretending to be a rich
bachelor traveling in Europe, a "private side which was
capable of killing Laci and Conner," Harris said.
'Cold, calculating'
Prosecutors said they never would be able to say for
sure how Peterson carried out the crime and doubted the
former fertilizer salesman would ever admit his acts.
"I think he'll go to his grave with his mouth tightly
sealed," said county District Attorney Jim Brazelton.
Asked if Peterson had selected Dec. 23, 2002,
specifically to murder his wife or just seized the
opportunity, Distaso said, "I think he did mean to do it
that night."
He cited a fishing license he bought three days earlier,
apparently to set up his fishing alibi. He acknowledged
that Peterson had invited his sister-in-law, Amy Rocha,
for dinner that night, an invitation she declined, but
said he thought the offer of a meal was just a bid to
strengthen his story.
"I think Scott Peterson was a cold, calculating person,
and I think he intended to kill Laci later in the
evening after Amy had left," Distaso said. "I think he
was thinking of a way to set up his alibi."
Although many legal commentators have called the
location of the bodies the strongest piece of evidence
against Peterson, Brazelton said he would have pressed
murder charges even if the 27-year-old's remains and
those of her child had never been recovered.
"Definitely, yes," he said.
The detectives said the biggest mistake Peterson made
was the nonchalant attitude he displayed in the wake of
his wife's disappearance.
He seemed to think that a 27-year-old pregnant woman
vanishing would attract scant attention from police and
the national media, Buehler said.
"I think he judged not only us, but probably you guys,
too, and the efforts you were going to put into it," the
detective told reporters.
Peterson's comment to his mistress, Amber Frey, that he
expected be free to pursue a more intense relationship
in January 2003, just a month after his wife went
missing, indicated he never anticipated the massive
national media coverage of the expectant mother's
disappearance, Buehler said.
Peterson's stoic demeanor two years ago made it less
surprising when he showed no emotion in court Wednesday
as his wife's family castigated him for killing her,
Brocchini said.
"It wasn't a surprise to me. That's been his reaction
since the first day I met him: calm, cool, nonchalant,
polite, arrogant, thinks he is smarter than everybody,"
the detective said.
http://www.courttv.com/trials/peterson/031705_ctv.html