SII Chat Room

Not only do I believe that the prosecution did not prove its case, I also believe that Scott is innocent! I also believe that Laci was abducted by someone who was involved in the Medina burglary. I believe Lt. Apontes statement to Modesto police regarding the phone call he overheard. Todd and Pearce know what happened, I believe. The only other theory I have comes from Matt Daltons book where he talks about the cult activity in and around Modesto and the woman who was assaulted and then told her counselor, who then reported that the womans attackers told her there would be a Christmas day murder. I believe Conner could have been used in some sort of ritual which could also explain why he was found beyond the shoreline. I DO NOT believe he washed ashore. I think its possible that the Medina burglary and the cult activity involve the same people so both theories could also be true! Either or both, Scott did not commit this crime and I will never believe otherwise!

tees wrote:Not only do I believe that the prosecution did not prove its case, I also believe that Scott is innocent! I also believe that Laci was abducted by someone who was involved in the Medina burglary. I believe Lt. Apontes statement to Modesto police regarding the phone call he overheard. Todd and Pearce know what happened, I believe. The only other theory I have comes from Matt Daltons book where he talks about the cult activity in and around Modesto and the woman who was assaulted and then told her counselor, who then reported that the womans attackers told her there would be a Christmas day murder. I believe Conner could have been used in some sort of ritual which could also explain why he was found beyond the shoreline. I DO NOT believe he washed ashore. I think its possible that the Medina burglary and the cult activity involve the same people so both theories could also be true! Either or both, Scott did not commit this crime and I will never believe otherwise!

IIRC, the first thing Todd said at his arrest was "I didn't have nothing to do with no pregnant lady and her baby." Maybe. But, he saw something. Also, Matt Dalton is considered an 'odd-ball' by some. Conner did NOT wash ashore, and Marlene proved that a long time ago. So, we are in agreement there. Also, the baby boy was wearing a plastic bow tie. I'm not being insensitive. I'm telling the prosecution to "give me a break." Scott is innocent.

Kyle wrote:IIRC, the first thing Todd said at his arrest was "I didn't have nothing to do with no pregnant lady and her baby." Maybe. But, he saw something. Also, Matt Dalton is considered an 'odd-ball' by some. Conner did NOT wash ashore, and Marlene proved that a long time ago. So, we are in agreement there. Also, the baby boy was wearing a plastic bow tie. I'm not being insensitive. I'm telling the prosecution to "give me a break." Scott is innocent.

Who thinks Dalton is an oddball? Maybe someone who didn't like his whistleblowing at the LA County DA's?

I think Dalton told it like he saw it and I don't think he's an oddball at all. I think he's actually very cool for what he did.

And there are so many things that support Peterson's innocence here, including that bow-tie on the baby's neck, and the fact that no way could that little baby have washed over those rocks and been in the condition he was in.

Lots of unanswered questions in this case. Hope some answers come.

Lowflyin_Lolana wrote:

Kyle wrote:IIRC, the first thing Todd said at his arrest was "I didn't have nothing to do with no pregnant lady and her baby." Maybe. But, he saw something. Also, Matt Dalton is considered an 'odd-ball' by some. Conner did NOT wash ashore, and Marlene proved that a long time ago. So, we are in agreement there. Also, the baby boy was wearing a plastic bow tie. I'm not being insensitive. I'm telling the prosecution to "give me a break." Scott is innocent.

Who thinks Dalton is an oddball? Maybe someone who didn't like his whistleblowing at the LA County DA's?

I think Dalton told it like he saw it and I don't think he's an oddball at all. I think he's actually very cool for what he did.

And there are so many things that support Peterson's innocence here, including that bow-tie on the baby's neck, and the fact that no way could that little baby have washed over those rocks and been in the condition he was in.

Lots of unanswered questions in this case. Hope some answers come.

I didn't say that I think Dalton is an oddball. There is so much evidence that wasn't considered. If Scott is granted a new trial, we may get some truthful answers this time.