Judge issues gag order in Peterson
murder case
Warrants likely to be unsealed under 2nd ruling
Henry K. Lee, Chronicle
Staff Writer
Friday, June 13, 2003
The judge overseeing the double-murder case against
Scott Peterson barred attorneys and police Thursday from
discussing the case, while another judge ruled that
search warrants filed in support of Peterson's arrest
should be unsealed next month.
Judge Al Girolami of Stanislaus County Superior Court,
citing the "massive" media interest in the case, ordered
defense attorneys, prosecutors, police and potential
witnesses from sharing their opinions with reporters or
releasing any evidence.
"Besides extensive local television and radio coverage,
the national television media has embraced this case
with a passion, providing frequent commentaries from
notables like Larry King, Geraldo Rivera and Katie
Couric," Girolami wrote in his six-page ruling.
In issuing the gag order, the judge noted that even
Peterson's lead attorney, Mark Geragos of Los Angeles,
regularly discussed the case on cable news programs
before he was retained to defend Peterson on charges of
murdering his wife, Laci, and their unborn son.
Girolami said he had considered "less restrictive
alternatives" that would ensure Peterson's right to a
fair trial, including asking for a change of venue and
questioning potential jurors extensively.
"A change of venue and extensive voir dire are not
especially helpful in this case because of the
exceptional amount of publicity which has been broadcast
throughout this state and country," Girolami wrote.
But Judge Roger Beauchesne of Stanislaus County Superior
Court disagreed in a separate ruling earlier Thursday,
saying the intense coverage did not warrant keeping key
court documents in the case sealed.
Eight warrants -- including affidavits outlining
probable cause for Peterson's arrest and an inventory of
items seized by Modesto police -- should be released now
that he is in custody, Beauchesne said. Peterson has
pleaded not guilty.
The ruling does not cover the arrest warrant affidavit
or autopsy reports, which remain sealed and are under
the jurisdiction of the other judge.
Beauchesne, who is handling civil matters in the case,
called the continued sealing of the pre-arrest documents
"unjustified." But he postponed the release of the
papers until July 8, the day after a final ruling by an
appeals court is due.
Beauchesne said his review "fails to produce additional
evidence to justify sealing."
Peterson is in custody, and no other suspects are under
investigation, Beauchesne said. The judge had sealed the
documents before Peterson's April 18 arrest on the
grounds that he didn't want any potential suspect to be
alerted.
Beauchesne had ordered the documents released after
Peterson's arrest. But an appeals court, agreeing with
prosecutors, said an arrest did not automatically mean
that the court papers should be unsealed.
Only a "change in circumstances" could warrant their
release, the appeals court ruled. On Thursday,
Beauchesne found that such a change occurred with
Peterson's arrest.
The gag order will apply to potential witnesses such as
Amber Frey, the massage therapist who came forward in
January to say she and Scott Peterson had been having an
affair before Laci Peterson disappeared.
Frey's attorney, Gloria Allred, said Thursday that she
did not appear to fall under the gag order and could
continue to defend her client's reputation.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/06/13/BA300905.DTL